<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran: War cannot be ruled out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/</link>
	<description>Rated 6th most influential EU blog by Waggener Edstrom. European of British nationality, for nearly 30 years Bruxellois. Deep believer in the principle of 'mutuality' and Monnet's axiom "Thought cannot be divorced from action", equivalent to Wang Yangming's "Zhixingheyi".</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:31:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levas</title>
		<link>http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>Levas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 21:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-461</guid>
		<description>Here after the Ossetia  crisis, after US backup for Georgia and Ukrane which both are at Russian doors. I will be not surprised seeing Article titles like BUSH DECLARED WAR ON RUSSIA, well of course this is unreal, most probably wont happen, but IMAGINE  seeing it on CNN, instead WAR ON TERROR, now WAR AGAINST RUSSIA. Isn&#039;t it blood chilling? That would be it. .. the hysteria, mutual blaming. What option has USA, if they get bounty here in Georgia, they wont get bounties on IRAN. 


We have NUCLEAR DETENTION, we need to have a TERRITORICAL DETENTION.  

What role does NATO PLAY? I am laughing, NATO is just setting everybody appart, against each other.. all the time.. another funny peace keeping organisation.
CAN ANYBODY TELL WHAT OTHER ROLE EXCEPT SPREADING US DEMOCRACY NATO HAS. It is useless, it should be suppresed. Because USA will keep on exploiting small countries like Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Then Georgia Ukrane, for their policy (DEEDS), NOW if they get to the doorstep of Russia with ABRAMS, then don&#039;t blame RUSSIANS.. for their SOVIET(NONDEMOCRATIC) nature heritage or policy (OBVIOUS NONSENSE!) - this wont be the reason!!!!!.. It was not about CAPITALISM vs COMMUNISM then, It was and is about cultures, and nations. Thus the territorial detention is needed - To respect everybody&#039;s COURTYARD is essential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here after the Ossetia  crisis, after US backup for Georgia and Ukrane which both are at Russian doors. I will be not surprised seeing Article titles like BUSH DECLARED WAR ON RUSSIA, well of course this is unreal, most probably wont happen, but IMAGINE  seeing it on CNN, instead WAR ON TERROR, now WAR AGAINST RUSSIA. Isn&#8217;t it blood chilling? That would be it. .. the hysteria, mutual blaming. What option has USA, if they get bounty here in Georgia, they wont get bounties on IRAN. </p>
<p>We have NUCLEAR DETENTION, we need to have a TERRITORICAL DETENTION.  </p>
<p>What role does NATO PLAY? I am laughing, NATO is just setting everybody appart, against each other.. all the time.. another funny peace keeping organisation.<br />
CAN ANYBODY TELL WHAT OTHER ROLE EXCEPT SPREADING US DEMOCRACY NATO HAS. It is useless, it should be suppresed. Because USA will keep on exploiting small countries like Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, Then Georgia Ukrane, for their policy (DEEDS), NOW if they get to the doorstep of Russia with ABRAMS, then don&#8217;t blame RUSSIANS.. for their SOVIET(NONDEMOCRATIC) nature heritage or policy (OBVIOUS NONSENSE!) &#8211; this wont be the reason!!!!!.. It was not about CAPITALISM vs COMMUNISM then, It was and is about cultures, and nations. Thus the territorial detention is needed &#8211; To respect everybody&#8217;s COURTYARD is essential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Maszka</title>
		<link>http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>John Maszka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-259</guid>
		<description>“I believe President Bush is going to order air strikes (on Iran) before he leaves office”
-Norman Podhoretz (Lyons, 2007).

Bush and his cronies say they want peace and diplomacy, but the problem with the members of Bush administration is that you can&#039;t trust them. You can&#039;t take what they at face value. As former Nixon aide John W. Dean wrote, “George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney have created the most secretive presidency of my lifetime. Their secrecy is far worse than during Watergate” (quoted in Wittkopf and Jones, 2008, 329).  	 
	The administration secretly planned and prepared for war with Iraq without disclosing it to the general public. Planning began in November of 2001 and included upgrading airfields in various Gulf countries, moving supplies to the region and the construction of necessary facilities. By April 2002, the planning and preparation for war was also being hidden from Congress. Bush had instructed General Tommy Franks not to make financial requests through Washington. “Anything you need, you’ll have.” The money would no longer be appropriated through congress. By the end of July 2002, Bush had approved more than thirty projects totaling over $700 million. Congress had no knowledge or involvement (Woodward, 2004, 122). 
In December of 2002, Bush and Rumsfeld agreed to start secretly deploying troops into the theatre so as not to attract the attention of the press or the rest of the world.  The first deployment order went out on December 6, 2002 and deployments continued every two weeks or so thereafter. Troops were given less than a week’s notice at times.  In January 2003, the Bush administration arranged for much of its humanitarian relief to be disguised as general contributions to conceal its war planning from the NGO recipients. Yet, when asked about Iraq, Bush’s favorite response was “I have no war plans on my desk.” At one point or another after the planning began, nearly every member of the administration publicly denied any plans to go to war with Iraq (Woodward, 2004, 129).  

A better approach to Iran would be negotiations. While Fareed Zakaria agrees that there is no reason not to use sanctions and embargoes against states such as Iran, he suggests that we also need to “allow a viable way out.” That is to say, we need to negotiate and not merely mandate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I believe President Bush is going to order air strikes (on Iran) before he leaves office”<br />
-Norman Podhoretz (Lyons, 2007).</p>
<p>Bush and his cronies say they want peace and diplomacy, but the problem with the members of Bush administration is that you can&#8217;t trust them. You can&#8217;t take what they at face value. As former Nixon aide John W. Dean wrote, “George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney have created the most secretive presidency of my lifetime. Their secrecy is far worse than during Watergate” (quoted in Wittkopf and Jones, 2008, 329).<br />
	The administration secretly planned and prepared for war with Iraq without disclosing it to the general public. Planning began in November of 2001 and included upgrading airfields in various Gulf countries, moving supplies to the region and the construction of necessary facilities. By April 2002, the planning and preparation for war was also being hidden from Congress. Bush had instructed General Tommy Franks not to make financial requests through Washington. “Anything you need, you’ll have.” The money would no longer be appropriated through congress. By the end of July 2002, Bush had approved more than thirty projects totaling over $700 million. Congress had no knowledge or involvement (Woodward, 2004, 122).<br />
In December of 2002, Bush and Rumsfeld agreed to start secretly deploying troops into the theatre so as not to attract the attention of the press or the rest of the world.  The first deployment order went out on December 6, 2002 and deployments continued every two weeks or so thereafter. Troops were given less than a week’s notice at times.  In January 2003, the Bush administration arranged for much of its humanitarian relief to be disguised as general contributions to conceal its war planning from the NGO recipients. Yet, when asked about Iraq, Bush’s favorite response was “I have no war plans on my desk.” At one point or another after the planning began, nearly every member of the administration publicly denied any plans to go to war with Iraq (Woodward, 2004, 129).  </p>
<p>A better approach to Iran would be negotiations. While Fareed Zakaria agrees that there is no reason not to use sanctions and embargoes against states such as Iran, he suggests that we also need to “allow a viable way out.” That is to say, we need to negotiate and not merely mandate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Stirling</title>
		<link>http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Stirling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://crossick.blogactiv.eu/2008/07/10/developing-world-views-from-capital-iran-war-cannot-be-ruled-out/#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Good article.  Please see my article WAR ON IRAN: THE PERFECT STORM FROM HELL.  It outlines that Iran already has weapons of mass destruction, advanced biowar, that can kill hundreds of millions in North America, Western Europe and the Middle East.

Stirling

blog Europe: http;//europebusines.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  Please see my article WAR ON IRAN: THE PERFECT STORM FROM HELL.  It outlines that Iran already has weapons of mass destruction, advanced biowar, that can kill hundreds of millions in North America, Western Europe and the Middle East.</p>
<p>Stirling</p>
<p>blog Europe: http;//europebusines.blogspot.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

