EU a laughing stock over mercury

Posted by Stanley Crossick on 12/06/10
Tags: , ,  

Do the EU leaders really want strong external representation?  The dispute over who should have represented the Union at the international talks on phasing out mercury in Stockholm on 7-11 June, puts this into doubt.

The EU was unable to speak with a single voice, or even negotiate, at the First Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to prepare a Globally Legally Binding Instrument on Mercury, because of deadlock between the Commission and Council of Ministers over who should take the lead in international negotiations on environment, climate change, energy and other policy areas which have their competence shared between the EU and the Member States. 

So much for the Lisbon Treaty strengthening the Union externally.  This will only be achieved through political will, solidarity – which has all but disappeared – and avoiding turf wars.  What happened on mercury makes us a laughing stock.

One Response to EU a laughing stock over mercury »»

  1. Comment by Linda_Margaret | 2010/06/14 at 16:24:05

    I think that you’ll find that the blogger and Europundit Julien Frisch has made the same observation regarding two different events (involving Van Rompuy and Cathy Ashton) here: http://julienfrisch.blogspot.com/2010/05/joke.html. It’s frustrating for the EU, I’m sure, but it is even more frustrating for those of us taxpayers funding them.


Leave a Reply »»

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Stanley's blog rss

Rated 6th most influential EU blog by Waggener Edstrom. European of British nationality, for nearly 30 years Bruxellois. Deep believer in the principle of 'mutuality' and Monnet's axiom "Thought cannot be divorced from action", equivalent to Wang Yangming's "Zhixingheyi". more.



Advertisement